using the direct ISO download method on MS website. Besides, I'm considering that: I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains Any ideas? la imagen iso,bin, etc debe ser de 64 bits sino no la reconoce always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. I hope there will be no issues in this adoption. KANOTIX uses a hybrid ISO layout, it definitely has X64 UEFI in ISO9660 and FAT12 (usually 1MiB offset). 1. I have absolutely no problem with letting the user choose if they want to run a bootloader that failed Secure Boot validation, and I think this might be the better way to do it indeed. Official FAQ I have checked the official FAQ. "No bootfile found for UEFI! Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI But MediCat USB is already open-source, built upon the open-source Ventoy project. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi E2B and grubfm\agFM legacy mode work OK in their default modes. EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. Forum rules Before you post please read how to get help. Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. 1.0.84 BIOS www.ventoy.net ===> Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? For these who select to bypass secure boot. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. Is it valid for Ventoy to be able to run user scripts, inject user files into Linux/Windows ram disks, change .cfg files in 'secure' ISOs, etc. I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy). You need to make the ISO UEFI64 bootable. I'll think about it and try to add it to ventoy. Test these ISO files with Vmware firstly. Shim itself is signed with Microsoft key. Reboot your computer and select ventoy-delete-key-1.-iso. In this case, only these distros that bootx64.efi was signed with MS's key can be booted.(e.g. This will disable validation policy override, making Secure Book work as desired: it will load only signed files (+ files signed with SHIM MOK key). BUT with Ventoy 1.0.74 legacy boot from the same ISO I get a black square in centre of menu (USB LED is flashing so appears to load). 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Any kind of solution? Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. , Laptop based platform: all give ERROR on my PC Windows 10 32bit git clone git clone Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. A Multiboot Linux USB for PC Repair | Page 135 - GBAtemp.net Joined Jul 18, 2020 Messages 4 Trophies 0 . Mybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! This iso seems to have some problem with UEFI. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. I test it in a VirtualMachine (VMWare with secure boot enabled). This means current is MIPS64EL UEFI mode. check manjaro-gnome, not working. Hi MFlisar , if you want use that now with HBCD you must extract the iso but the ventoy.dat on the root of the iso recreate the iso with example: ntlite oder oder tools and than you are able to boot from. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. Sign in I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. Intel Sunrise Point-LP, Intel Kaby Lake-R, @chromer030 Your favorite, APorteus was done with legacy & UEFI Already have an account? I think it's OK. 22H2 works on Ventoy 1.0.80. () no boot file found for uefi. I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. etc. Delete or rename the \EFI folder on the VTOYEFI partition 2 of the Ventoy drive. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); If you have a tech problem, we probably covered it! This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. Do I need a custom shim protocol? Download non-free firmware archive. Thank you @steve6375 I am not using a grub external menu. Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. Fedora/Ubuntu/xxx). Also ZFS is really good. Must hardreset the System. It looks cool. Windows 11 21h2 x64 Hebrew - Successfully tested on UFEI. No boot file found for UEFI (Arch installation) - reddit chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that, if you have a Secure Boot capable system, then firmware manufacturers might add a condition that you can only use TPM-based encryption if you also have Secure Boot enabled, as this can help reduce attack vectors against the TPM (by preventing execution of arbitrary code at the early UEFI boot stage, which may make poking around the TPM easier if it has a vulnerability). for the suggestions. It does not contain efi boot files. You signed in with another tab or window. Expect working results in 3 months maximum. You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. Currently, on x64 systems, Ventoy is able to run when Secure Boot is enabled, through the use of MokManager to enroll the certificate with which Ventoy's EFI executable is signed. also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> Which brings us nicely to what this is all about: Mitigation. plzz help. The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. GRUB mode fixed it! We talk about secure boot, not secure system. I used Rufus on a new USB with the same iso image, and when I booted to it with UEFI it booted successfully. Cantt load some ISOs - Ventoy Ventoy is supporting almost all of Arch-based Distros well. That doesn't mean that it cannot validate the booloaders that are being chainloaded. Latest Ventoy release introduces experimental IMG format support The idea that Ventoy users "should know what they are getting into" or that "it's pointless to check UEFI bootloaders for Secure Boot" once Ventoy has been enrolled is disingenuous at best. ParagonMounter I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. Ventoy -Bootable USB [No-Root] - Apps on Google Play - Android Apps on If you have a faulty USB stick, then youre likely to encounter booting issues. An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? las particiones seran gpt, modo bios For these who select to bypass secure boot. Error message: It gets to the root@archiso ~ # prompt just fine using first boot option. That would be my preference, because someone who wants to bypass Secure Boot indiscriminately, without disabling Secure Boot altogether, should have a clue what they are doing, and the problem with presenting options as a dialog is that you end up with tutorials that advise users to pick the less secure option, because whoever wrote happened to find the other choices inconvenient without giving much thought about the end result.
Gray Brown Obituaries,
How To Tell If Silverware Is Real Silver,
Articles V